What reasons should embryonic stem cells research be unacceptable by society?
I am working on a research paper concerning embryonic stem cells. I need more supportive evidence that is against any type of research involving the destruction of human life. Or any reason why any research taken towards embryonic stem cells is unnecessary. I have some exceptional Internet resources; also I found a great book, "The human embryonic stem cell debate". edited by Suzanne Holland, Karen Lebacqz, and Laurie Zoloth. How do I find other good resources that are out there, can anyone help me find any? Also what are your views on this topic?
Public Comments
- I don't know and don't feel like doing research (sorry.) But my view on it, when specifically related to human embryonic research, is that it is wrong because there are other sources of stem cells out there like when baby teeth fall out, if they are preserved they have some stem cells for example and umbilical cords. Also it is most definitely wrong if they use the unborn, or aborted. I think if their is a miscarriage it is up to the mom and dad to decide. That would be more like when someone donates a body to research. Personally though, I would never donate my baby to research...that just sounds disturbing.
- http://www.c-spanclassroom.org/SearchVideo.aspx Visit this site. It shows clips of Congress debating Stem Cell research and funding, in which they discuss the pros and cons. Type in the search box, stem cell. Good luck
Powered by Yahoo! Answers